ASSIGNMENT代写

新西兰奥克兰作业代写:国家的政策

2020-01-14 18:22

为了应对这一日益增长的威胁,大多数国家的政策框架和做法都赞同自1648年威斯特伐利亚条约以来形成的关于国家主权的信念,该条约赋予国家对其管辖领土上发生的所有安全威胁作出反应的专有权和责任。这种认识使一些国家相信,它们可以在利益相关者很少或没有参与的情况下应对所有安全威胁,包括网络犯罪。然而,网络犯罪给国家和非国家行为者(包括个人)带来的规模、动态性和风险,使我们越来越难以忽视私营利益相关者在制定共同倡议和措施方面所发挥的作用。区域和全球水平,最重要的利益相关者的重要性的伙伴关系在确保网络安全也一直强调在英国(英国)国家网络安全战略(2016 - 2021)承认,政府无法提供国家网络安全的各个方面,公民需要嵌入式和可持续的方法,在社会和政府行业和其他合作伙伴,获得县发挥完全的作用网络,服务和数据。Garland在(MICHAEL & MATTHEW, 2013:2)中指出,“这种对警察和其他国家机构的局限性的认识,促进了依靠‘负责任’的私人行动者和公民社会在减少犯罪和混乱的努力中管理自己的空间的治理战略”。这两位学者认为,这也适用于网络犯罪和网络安全领域,因为网络犯罪带来的挑战不能仅靠警察来应对,所需的专业知识必须从警察之外引进。
新西兰奥克兰作业代写:国家的政策
In response to this growing threat, most States’ policy frameworks and practices have subscribed to the beliefs formed since Westphalia treaties of 1648 on state sovereignty which give to the State the exclusive power and responsibility to respond to all security threats occurring on the territory under its jurisdiction. This understanding has led some states to believe that they can deal with all security threats including cybercrimes with little or no involvement of stakeholders. However, the scale, the dynamic nature and risks that cybercrimes present to both State and non-State actors including individuals make it apparent that it is increasingly difficult to ignore the role of private stakeholders in developing common initiatives and measures that enable effective combating of cybercrimes on a national, regional and global level .The overriding importance of stakeholders’ partnership in ensuring cyber-security has also been underscored in the United Kingdom (UK) National Cyber Security Strategy (2016-2021) which recognises that the government alone cannot provide all aspects of the nation’s cyber security and that an embedded and sustainable approach is needed where citizens, industry and other partners in society and government, play their full part in securing the county networks, services and data. Garland cited in (MICHAEL & MATTHEW, 2013:2) argues that “this recognition of the limits of policing and of other state agencies promotes governing strategies that rely on ‘responsibilising’ private actors and civil society to govern their own spaces in crime and disorder reduction efforts”. The two scholars are of the view that this applies as well to the domain of cybercrime and cybersecurity because the challenge posed by cybercrime cannot be met by the police alone and the expertise required must be brought in from outside the police.