惠灵顿作业代写:部分原因

2017-04-10 01:46

部分原因是这种干预是相对较新的，出现的证据尚不清楚。友谊等。（2002）发现reconvictions率下降14%后，认知技能治疗相比，对照组不接受这是训练量在两年后释放。看，falshaw，纽金特，友谊（2003），同时，在回顾两年的证据在两年期间1998结束后，发现结果完全不同。使用许多相同的方法，如友谊等。（2002）这项研究发现，参与认知罪犯计划的人与匹配的对照组没有显著差异，最近的研究倾向于证实这些后来的发现。威尔金森（2005）进行了研究的有效性的推理和康复（R&R）在资源充足的设施干预。当比较定罪率，收到了R & R训练组有67%的重新犯罪率相比对照组的人在56%的全国平均水平接近。虽然这些结果与预期相反，它也发现，预期的态度变化没有看到那些已经完成了R & R干预，事实上，参与者的态度恶化。
惠灵顿作业代写:部分原因
Partly because this intervention is relatively new, the evidence emerging is not yet clear. Friendship et al. (2002) found that reconvictions rates dropped 14% after the cognitive skills treatment compared to a matched group that did not receive the training - this was measured over the two years following release. Cann, Falshaw, Nugent, Friendship (2003), meanwhile, in reviewing evidence from only two years later in a two-year period ending in 1998, found quite different results. Using much the same methods as Friendship et al. (2002), this study found no significant difference between those who had taken part in the cognitive offender programmes and a matched control group.Very recent research has tended to confirm these later findings. Wilkinson (2005) carried out research into the effectiveness of a Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R) intervention in a well-resourced facility. When comparing conviction rates, the group that had received the R&R training had reconviction rates of 67% compared to the matched group who were closer to the national averages at 56%. While these results were contrary to expectations, it was also found that the expected attitude change was not seen in those who had completed the R&R intervention, in fact the attitudes of the participants worsened.

• 上一篇：惠灵顿assignment代写:员工的愿望
• 下一篇：惠灵顿 assignment 代写:VLE的边缘